Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TGRYX
CSFZX vs TGRYX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TGRYX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
TCW Global Real Estate N
Price$12.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.47M
CSFZX vs TGRYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TGRYX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TGRYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. TGRYX (39.5M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TGRYX: CSFZX (2.77) vs TGRYX (1.97). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TGRYX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TGRYX (11 years). TGRYX (1.85) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). TGRYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.48 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGRYX: CSFZX (0) vs TGRYX (2000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. TGRYX (6.99). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.52 vs. TGRYX (9.57).
| CSFZX | TGRYX | CSFZX / TGRYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.85 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.886 | 7.968 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 39.5M | 5,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 1.97 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 6.99 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.11 | 22.16 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.52 | 9.57 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | 56.76 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement