Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TGREX
CSFZX vs TGREX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TGREX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.31 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
TCW Global Real Estate I
Price$12.62
Change+$0.13 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.73M
CSFZX vs TGREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TGREX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and TGREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. TGREX (41.7M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TGREX: CSFZX (2.82) vs TGREX (1.94). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TGREX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TGREX (11 years). TGREX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). TGREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.48 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGREX: CSFZX (0) vs TGREX (2000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.40 vs. TGREX (-0.41). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. TGREX (25.72).
| CSFZX | TGREX | CSFZX / TGREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.42 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.961 | 9.795 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 41.7M | 4,751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 1.94 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | -0.41 | -344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 18.23 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 25.72 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.11 | 67.62 | 90% |