Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.31 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.95M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. SWASX (290M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.19) vs CSFZX (2.82). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. CSFZX (1.40). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. SWASX (20.78).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.961 | 10.239 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 290M | 683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.19 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | 3.67 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 14.78 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 20.78 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.11 | 46.05 | 133% |