Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.84
Change+$0.26 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. SWASX (295M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than SWASX: CSFZX (3.52) vs SWASX (3.11). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (19 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. CSFZX (15.32). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 21.50 vs. SWASX (18.73).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.365 | 2.663 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 295M | 694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 3.11 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.32 | 16.90 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.03 | 19.12 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.50 | 18.73 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.28 | 50.06 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement