Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.98M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. SWASX (287M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.33) vs CSFZX (2.93). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. CSFZX (3.69). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.17 vs. SWASX (19.54).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.129 | 8.285 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 287M | 690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 3.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | 6.24 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | 2.97 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.17 | 19.54 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.68 | 31.62 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement