Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.94
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$7.03
Change+$0.42 (+6.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.51M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. SWASX (282M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than SWASX: CSFZX (3.42) vs SWASX (2.99). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (19 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.59 vs. CSFZX (11.74). CSFZX (19.32) and SWASX (18.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.548 | 3.994 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 282M | 726% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 15.59 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.59 | 16.50 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 18.38 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.06 | 50.40 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement