Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURGX
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.31 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
PGIM Global Real Estate R4
Price$20.62
Change+$0.12 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.16M
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and PURGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. PURGX (870M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURGX: CSFZX (2.82) vs PURGX (2.36). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURGX (8 years). PURGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and PURGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PURGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. CSFZX (1.40). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.39 vs. PURGX (7.72).
| CSFZX | PURGX | CSFZX / PURGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.52 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.961 | 9.104 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 870M | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 2.36 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | 1.94 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.39 | 17.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 7.72 | 368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.11 | N/A | - |