Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURGX
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.24
Change-$0.74 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
PGIM Global Real Estate R4
Price$20.68
Change-$0.22 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets900.51M
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. PURGX (901M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURGX: CSFZX (2.84) vs PURGX (2.33). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURGX (8 years). PURGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and PURGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. PURGX (5.01). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.35 vs. PURGX (5.11).
| CSFZX | PURGX | CSFZX / PURGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.52 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.454 | 9.969 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 901M | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 5.01 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.36 | 23.74 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.35 | 5.11 | 437% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement