Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$56.47
Change+$0.53 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$20.64
Change+$0.19 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. PURCX (1.01B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (3.42) vs PURCX (1.55). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (28 years). PURCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. PURCX (10.46). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. PURCX (-1.30).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.31 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.31 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.548 | 3.913 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 1.01B | 203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 1.55 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 10.46 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.59 | 14.24 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | -1.30 | -1,490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.06 | 12.30 | 521% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement