Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$20.19
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets891.81M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and PURCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. PURCX (892M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.80) vs PURCX (1.41). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (27 years). PURCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.08 vs. PURCX (0.49). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.56 vs. PURCX (5.35).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.355 | 9.414 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 892M | 233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.41 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 0.49 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.29 | 32.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.56 | 5.35 | 571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.82 | -0.80 | -6,120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement