Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$19.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets854.57M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. PURCX (855M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.89) vs PURCX (1.52). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (27 years). PURCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. PURCX (7.42). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 36.16 vs. PURCX (5.62).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.806 | 5.891 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 855M | 235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 1.52 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | 7.42 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.40 | 7.67 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.16 | 5.62 | 644% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.72 | -2.91 | -1,674% |