Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.50
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$19.41
Change-$0.17 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets869.83M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. PURCX (870M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.67) vs PURCX (1.53). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (27 years). PURCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). CSFZX (9.97) and PURCX (9.70) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. PURCX (2.92).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.758 | 4.781 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 870M | 229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 1.53 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 9.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | 14.12 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | 2.92 | 1,054% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.53 | -4.17 | -1,114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement