Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURAX
CSFZX vs PURAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.94
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
PGIM Global Real Estate A
Price$21.22
Change+$0.73 (+3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
CSFZX vs PURAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. PURAX (1B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURAX: CSFZX (3.42) vs PURAX (2.37). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURAX (28 years). PURAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURAX: CSFZX (0) vs PURAX (1000). CSFZX (11.74) and PURAX (11.58) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. PURAX (2.69).
| CSFZX | PURAX | CSFZX / PURAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.37 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.37 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.548 | 4.020 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 1B | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.37 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 11.58 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.59 | 17.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 2.69 | 718% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.06 | 20.24 | 316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement