Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURAX
CSFZX vs PURAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.24
Change-$0.74 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
PGIM Global Real Estate A
Price$20.57
Change-$0.21 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets900.51M
CSFZX vs PURAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. PURAX (901M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURAX: CSFZX (2.84) vs PURAX (2.04). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURAX (28 years). PURAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURAX: CSFZX (0) vs PURAX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. PURAX (4.65). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.35 vs. PURAX (3.66).
| CSFZX | PURAX | CSFZX / PURAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.38 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.38 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.454 | 9.636 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 901M | 228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.04 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 4.65 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.36 | 22.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.35 | 3.66 | 610% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.21 | 10.97 | 522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement