Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs NMMGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Northern Multi-Manager Glbl Real Estate
Price$10.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.2M
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. NMMGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and NMMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. NMMGX (88.2M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than NMMGX: CSFZX (2.89) vs NMMGX (2.22). CSFZX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs NMMGX (17 years). NMMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. NMMGX (56.04). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFZX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. NMMGX (7.54). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.68 vs. NMMGX (20.05).
| CSFZX | NMMGX | CSFZX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.93 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.627 | 4.738 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 88.2M | 2,261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.22 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 7.54 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.89 | 5.76 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.68 | 20.05 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.83 | -7.16 | -724% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement