Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs NMMGX
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs NMMGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
Northern Multi-Manager Glbl Real Estate
Price$10.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.9M
CSFZX vs NMMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. NMMGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and NMMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. NMMGX (84.9M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than NMMGX: CSFZX (2.80) vs NMMGX (1.99). CSFZX was incepted earlier than NMMGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs NMMGX (17 years). NMMGX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. NMMGX (57.69). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMMGX: CSFZX (0) vs NMMGX (2500). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.08 vs. NMMGX (-2.26). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.56 vs. NMMGX (18.76).
| CSFZX | NMMGX | CSFZX / NMMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.355 | 6.971 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 84.9M | 2,452% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.99 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | -2.26 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.29 | 24.79 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.56 | 18.76 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.82 | -8.61 | -567% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement