Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs JARSX
CSFZX vs JARSX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs JARSX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.50
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Easterly Global Real Estate R6
Price$15.72
Change-$0.13 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.05M
CSFZX vs JARSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. JARSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and JARSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. JARSX (265M). JARSX (2.68) and CSFZX (2.67) have matching dividends . CSFZX was incepted earlier than JARSX: CSFZX (11 years) vs JARSX (8 years). JARSX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). JARSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and JARSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JARSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.15 vs. CSFZX (9.97). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. JARSX (8.07).
| CSFZX | JARSX | CSFZX / JARSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.758 | 9.794 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 265M | 752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 2.68 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 15.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | 7.85 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | 8.07 | 381% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement