Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs JARSX
CSFZX vs JARSX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs JARSX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.98
Change-$0.22 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Easterly Global Real Estate R6
Price$14.83
Change-$0.08 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.53M
CSFZX vs JARSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. JARSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and JARSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. JARSX (236M). JARSX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: JARSX (3.16) vs CSFZX (2.84). CSFZX was incepted earlier than JARSX: CSFZX (11 years) vs JARSX (8 years). JARSX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). JARSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and JARSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. JARSX (2.46). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.35 vs. JARSX (-4.11).
| CSFZX | JARSX | CSFZX / JARSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.454 | 5.636 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 236M | 872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 3.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 2.46 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.36 | 9.58 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.35 | -4.11 | -543% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement