Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs FIRCX
CSFZX vs FIRCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FIRCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.24
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate C
Price$10.18
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.94M
CSFZX vs FIRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FIRCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and FIRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. FIRCX (340M). FIRCX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: FIRCX (3.68) vs CSFZX (2.82). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FIRCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs FIRCX (18 years). FIRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). FIRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and FIRCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. CSFZX (0.86). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 29.21 vs. FIRCX (-6.41).
| CSFZX | FIRCX | CSFZX / FIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.92 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.92 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.981 | 19.812 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 340M | 606% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.68 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 5.64 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.47 | 3.88 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.21 | -6.41 | -456% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.62 | 14.63 | 407% |