Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.29M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. DGBCX (310M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.77) vs DGBCX (1.57). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). CSFZX (8.31) and DGBCX (8.02) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.52 vs. DGBCX (7.53).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.886 | 8.561 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 310M | 683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 1.57 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 8.02 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.11 | 24.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.52 | 7.53 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | 14.00 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement