Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.94
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.87
Change+$0.23 (+2.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.96M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. DGBCX (311M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (3.42) vs DGBCX (1.14). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (39.68). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. DGBCX (10.52). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. DGBCX (7.62).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.548 | 3.020 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 311M | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 1.14 | 299% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.74 | 10.52 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.59 | 14.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 7.62 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.06 | 25.44 | 252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement