Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.24
Change-$0.74 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.70
Change-$0.09 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.42M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. DGBCX (312M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.84) vs DGBCX (1.59). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. DGBCX (4.32). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.35 vs. DGBCX (9.68).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.454 | 9.057 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 312M | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.59 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 4.32 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.36 | 13.97 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.35 | 9.68 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.21 | 16.31 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement