Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs DGBCX
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.82
Change+$0.04 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets317.19M
CSFZX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. DGBCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and DGBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. DGBCX (317M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSFZX (2.80) vs DGBCX (1.58). CSFZX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGBCX: CSFZX (0) vs DGBCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.08 vs. DGBCX (0.79). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.56 vs. DGBCX (19.27).
| CSFZX | DGBCX | CSFZX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.05 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.355 | 9.429 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 317M | 657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 1.58 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.08 | 0.79 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.29 | 26.31 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.56 | 19.27 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.82 | 10.32 | 473% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers