Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLRX
CSFCX vs MGLRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLRX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$54.13
Change+$0.24 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
MFS Global Real Estate R6
Price$16.19
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
CSFCX vs MGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLRX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Buy and MGLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLRX (2.19B) and CSFCX (2.12B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MGLRX pays higher dividends than CSFCX: MGLRX (2.55) vs CSFCX (1.82). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLRX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLRX (13 years). CSFCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than MGLRX (0.86). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLRX (35.00). CSFCX (0) and MGLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. MGLRX (0.19). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.25 vs. MGLRX (-1.59).
| CSFCX | MGLRX | CSFCX / MGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.85 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.86 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.247 | 0.684 | 1,206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 2.19B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.55 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.63 | 0.19 | 4,110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.08 | 9.11 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.25 | -1.59 | -770% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.81 | 34.46 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement