Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLRX
CSFCX vs MGLRX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLRX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$55.30
Change+$0.26 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
MFS Global Real Estate R6
Price$16.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
CSFCX vs MGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLRX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Hold and MGLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLRX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. CSFCX (2.05B). MGLRX pays higher dividends than CSFCX: MGLRX (3.33) vs CSFCX (2.52). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLRX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLRX (14 years). CSFCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than MGLRX (0.86). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLRX (35.00). CSFCX (0) and MGLRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. MGLRX (8.31). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.59 vs. MGLRX (3.24).
| CSFCX | MGLRX | CSFCX / MGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.85 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.86 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.332 | 1.984 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 2.22B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 3.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 8.31 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.49 | 7.79 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.59 | 3.24 | 481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.59 | 52.14 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement