Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLCX
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$54.13
Change+$0.24 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLCX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Buy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX (2.19B) and CSFCX (2.12B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CSFCX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFCX (1.82) vs MGLCX (1.28). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFCX (1.84). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). CSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFCX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. MGLCX (0.37). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.25 vs. MGLCX (-5.01).
| CSFCX | MGLCX | CSFCX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.247 | 0.870 | 948% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 2.19B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.28 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.63 | 0.37 | 2,058% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.08 | 6.93 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.25 | -5.01 | -244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.81 | 15.83 | 214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement