Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFAX vs MGLCX
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFAX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty A
Price$54.32
Change+$0.24 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
CSFAX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFAX vs. MGLCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFAX is a Buy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX (2.2B) and CSFAX (2.12B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CSFAX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFAX (2.45) vs MGLCX (1.28). CSFAX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFAX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFAX (1.19). CSFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). CSFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFAX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. MGLCX (0.37). CSFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.55 vs. MGLCX (-5.01).
| CSFAX | MGLCX | CSFAX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.95 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.570 | 0.870 | 985% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 2.2B | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 1.28 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 0.37 | 2,150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.02 | 6.93 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.55 | -5.01 | -310% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.39 | 15.83 | 268% |