Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs PRKCX
CSEIX vs PRKCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs PRKCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.22
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.18B
PGIM Real Estate Income C
Price$7.42
Change-$0.07 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.1M
CSEIX vs PRKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. PRKCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Buy and PRKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.18B vs. PRKCX (56.1M). CSEIX pays higher dividends than PRKCX: CSEIX (2.79) vs PRKCX (2.56). CSEIX was incepted earlier than PRKCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs PRKCX (10 years). PRKCX (7.62) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). PRKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRKCX: CSEIX (0) vs PRKCX (1000). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.44 vs. PRKCX (-3.42). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.97 vs. PRKCX (1.90).
| CSEIX | PRKCX | CSEIX / PRKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.10 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 7.62 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.772 | 3.145 | 152% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.18B | 56.1M | 14,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.56 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | -3.42 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.94 | 25.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.97 | 1.90 | 1,261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.81 | 22.80 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement