Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs NBRFX
CSEIX vs NBRFX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs NBRFX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.56
Change+$0.15 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Tr
Price$13.87
Change+$0.14 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets679.29M
CSEIX vs NBRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. NBRFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Buy and NBRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.05B vs. NBRFX (679M). CSEIX pays higher dividends than NBRFX: CSEIX (2.45) vs NBRFX (2.03). CSEIX was incepted earlier than NBRFX: CSEIX (28 years) vs NBRFX (23 years). NBRFX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). NBRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBRFX: CSEIX (0) vs NBRFX (1000). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.71 vs. NBRFX (-4.16). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.85 vs. NBRFX (11.10).
| CSEIX | NBRFX | CSEIX / NBRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.39 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.39 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.761 | 0.652 | 730% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.05B | 679M | 1,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.03 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.71 | -4.16 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.29 | -4.54 | -248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.85 | 11.10 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.68 | 24.36 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers