Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.29
Change+$0.09 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$13.56
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets850.9M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Buy and FRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.05B vs. FRLCX (851M). FRLCX (2.59) and CSEIX (2.50) have matching dividends . CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (26 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. FRLCX (-7.80). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.79 vs. FRLCX (-13.29).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.93 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.02 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.053 | -1.230 | -248% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.05B | 851M | 946% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.34 | -7.80 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.30 | -23.59 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.79 | -13.29 | -232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.47 | -30.83 | -170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement