Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.51B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$13.53
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.99M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Buy and FRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.51B vs. FRLCX (769M). CSEIX (2.69) and FRLCX (2.64) have matching dividends . CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (26 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.10 vs. FRLCX (-1.35). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.40 vs. FRLCX (-15.48).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.93 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.02 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.480 | -0.962 | -258% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.51B | 769M | 1,107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 2.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.10 | -1.35 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.86 | 1.85 | 1,239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.40 | -15.48 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.64 | -27.57 | -191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers