Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.18B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$13.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets818.32M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Hold and FRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.18B vs. FRLCX (818M). CSEIX (2.69) and FRLCX (2.64) have matching dividends . CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (26 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.93 vs. FRLCX (-8.67). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.43 vs. FRLCX (-12.04).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.93 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.02 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.027 | 2.481 | 203% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.18B | 818M | 1,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 2.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.93 | -8.67 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | -4.11 | -429% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.43 | -12.04 | -203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.93 | -27.29 | -201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement