Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSEIX vs FRLCX
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSEIX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities A
Price$16.22
Change-$0.23 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.18B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$13.85
Change-$0.17 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.43M
CSEIX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSEIX vs. FRLCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSEIX is a Buy and FRLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSEIX has more cash in the bank: 8.18B vs. FRLCX (825M). CSEIX (2.79) and FRLCX (2.69) have matching dividends . CSEIX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CSEIX (28 years) vs FRLCX (26 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSEIX (1.10). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CSEIX (35.00). CSEIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CSEIX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CSEIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.44 vs. FRLCX (-6.76). CSEIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.97 vs. FRLCX (-13.68).
| CSEIX | FRLCX | CSEIX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.93 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.02 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.772 | 2.701 | 177% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.18B | 825M | 991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.69 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | -6.76 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.94 | -3.04 | -591% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.97 | -13.68 | -175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.81 | -24.52 | -244% |