Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs FTHFX
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$16.04
Change+$0.61 (+3.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.3M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FTHFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CSDGX (141M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FTHFX (0.63) vs CSDGX (0.45). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSDGX (7 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CSDGX (24.00). CSDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSDGX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. CSDGX (4.45). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.22 vs. CSDGX (16.02).
| CSDGX | FTHFX | CSDGX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.63 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.63 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.735 | 5.019 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.63 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 16.23 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.60 | 40.94 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.02 | 72.22 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 279.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers