Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSDGX vs FTHFX
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSDGX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth A
Price$15.61
Change+$0.17 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.8M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.11
Change+$0.54 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
CSDGX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSDGX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSDGX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. CSDGX (165M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSDGX: FTHFX (0.70) vs CSDGX (0.35). CSDGX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSDGX (7 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSDGX (1.55) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSDGX (24.00). CSDGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSDGX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.48 vs. CSDGX (-3.13). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 114.02 vs. CSDGX (38.28).
| CSDGX | FTHFX | CSDGX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.63 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.63 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.630 | 10.326 | 25% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 11.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.70 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.13 | 2.48 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.00 | 63.88 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.28 | 114.02 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 189.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers