Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSD vs XMHQ
CSD vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts CSD vs XMHQ
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
Price$112.51
Change-$2.07 (-1.81%)
Volume$100
Net Assets94.23M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$107.16
Change+$0.74 (+0.70%)
Volume$115
Net Assets5.28B
CSD vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSD vs. XMHQ commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSD is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.29B vs. CSD (94.2M). CSD has a higher annual dividend yield than XMHQ: CSD (14.888) vs XMHQ (3.905). CSD was incepted earlier than XMHQ: CSD (19 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). XMHQ (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than CSD (0.65). CSD has a higher turnover XMHQ (58.00) vs XMHQ (58.00).
| CSD | XMHQ | CSD / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 14.888 | 3.905 | 381% |
| Net Assets | 94.2M | 5.29B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.25 | 260% |
| Turnover | 74.00 | 58.00 | 128% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 0.62 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CSD | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CSD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSD has been closely correlated with VNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSD jumps, then VNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSD | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| VNT - CSD | 72% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| CR - CSD | 70% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GEHC - CSD | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| KNF - CSD | 58% Loosely correlated | +5.34% | ||
| AMTM - CSD | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||