CSCO
Price
$66.88
Change
-$1.11 (-1.63%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
264.47B
67 days until earnings call
FKWL
Price
$4.07
Change
-$0.05 (-1.21%)
Updated
Sep 5, 12:18 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
48.43M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSCO vs FKWL

Header iconCSCO vs FKWL Comparison
Open Charts CSCO vs FKWLBanner chart's image
Cisco Systems
Price$66.88
Change-$1.11 (-1.63%)
Volume$441.9K
Capitalization264.47B
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.07
Change-$0.05 (-1.21%)
Volume$840
Capitalization48.43M
CSCO vs FKWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSCO vs. FKWL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCO is a Hold and FKWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSCO: $67.99 vs. FKWL: $4.12)
Brand notoriety: CSCO: Notable vs. FKWL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCO: 76% vs. FKWL: 74%
Market capitalization -- CSCO: $264.47B vs. FKWL: $48.43M
CSCO [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $264.47B. FKWL’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $48.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $264.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFKWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSCO is a better buy in the long-term than FKWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FKWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSCO is a better buy in the short-term than FKWL.

Price Growth

CSCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -5.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Sep 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-0.30% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSCO($264B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($48.4M). CSCO YTD gains are higher at: 17.103 vs. FKWL (-15.918). CSCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.1B vs. FKWL (-3.79M). CSCO has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. FKWL (38.1M). FKWL has less debt than CSCO: FKWL (1.48M) vs CSCO (29.3B). CSCO has higher revenues than FKWL: CSCO (55.6B) vs FKWL (45.3M).
CSCOFKWLCSCO / FKWL
Capitalization264B48.4M545,455%
EBITDA15.1B-3.79M-398,586%
Gain YTD17.103-15.918-107%
P/E Ratio26.24N/A-
Revenue55.6B45.3M122,737%
Total Cash15.6B38.1M40,945%
Total Debt29.3B1.48M1,982,409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSCO vs FKWL: Fundamental Ratings
CSCO
FKWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
4393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSCO's Valuation (12) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (54) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

CSCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (100) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

CSCO's SMR Rating (43) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (93) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

CSCO's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FKWL (62) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CSCO (21) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to CSCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCOFKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTNM10.990.41
+3.88%
Contineum Therapeutics
RAVE3.340.10
+2.94%
Rave Restaurant Group
SNV52.120.68
+1.32%
Synovus Financial Corp
AAOI23.320.30
+1.30%
Applied Optoelectronics
BKKPF4.80N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.

CSCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCO has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSCO jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCO
1D Price
Change %
CSCO100%
+0.47%
EXTR - CSCO
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
ZBRA - CSCO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
BDC - CSCO
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
CIEN - CSCO
59%
Loosely correlated
+23.31%
LITE - CSCO
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.81%
More

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
+0.98%
ITRN - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
CSCO - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
BOSC - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
ADTN - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
More