CSCO
Price
$67.25
Change
-$0.60 (-0.88%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
268.22B
47 days until earnings call
FKWL
Price
$4.17
Change
-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.26M
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSCO vs FKWL

Header iconCSCO vs FKWL Comparison
Open Charts CSCO vs FKWLBanner chart's image
Cisco Systems
Price$67.25
Change-$0.60 (-0.88%)
Volume$3.46K
Capitalization268.22B
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Volume$119
Capitalization49.26M
CSCO vs FKWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSCO vs. FKWL commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCO is a Buy and FKWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CSCO: $67.85 vs. FKWL: $4.18)
Brand notoriety: CSCO: Notable vs. FKWL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCO: 114% vs. FKWL: 29%
Market capitalization -- CSCO: $268.22B vs. FKWL: $49.26M
CSCO [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $268.22B. FKWL’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $49.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $268.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $8.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFKWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSCO is a better buy in the long-term than FKWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FKWL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FKWL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the short-term than CSCO.

Price Growth

CSCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-0.13% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSCO($268B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($49.3M). CSCO YTD gains are higher at: 16.861 vs. FKWL (-14.694). CSCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.5B vs. FKWL (-3.79M). CSCO has more cash in the bank: 16.1B vs. FKWL (38.1M). FKWL has less debt than CSCO: FKWL (1.48M) vs CSCO (28.1B). CSCO has higher revenues than FKWL: CSCO (56.7B) vs FKWL (45.3M).
CSCOFKWLCSCO / FKWL
Capitalization268B49.3M543,611%
EBITDA15.5B-3.79M-409,145%
Gain YTD16.861-14.694-115%
P/E Ratio26.61N/A-
Revenue56.7B45.3M125,166%
Total Cash16.1B38.1M42,257%
Total Debt28.1B1.48M1,901,218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSCO vs FKWL: Fundamental Ratings
CSCO
FKWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
4293
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSCO's Valuation (11) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (52) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

CSCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for FKWL (100) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew significantly faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

CSCO's SMR Rating (42) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (93) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

CSCO's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FKWL (61) in the null industry. This means that CSCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CSCO (22) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to CSCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCOFKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JXN102.17-0.07
-0.07%
Jackson Financial
XNGSY32.58-0.25
-0.76%
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
BCML29.52-0.24
-0.81%
BayCom Corp
ARCO6.97-0.17
-2.38%
Arcos Dorados Holdings
TOP1.29-0.05
-3.73%
TOP Financial Group Limited

CSCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCO has been loosely correlated with EXTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSCO jumps, then EXTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCO
1D Price
Change %
CSCO100%
+0.79%
EXTR - CSCO
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
BDC - CSCO
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
ZBRA - CSCO
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
LITE - CSCO
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.16%
CIEN - CSCO
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
More

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-0.95%
ITRN - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
CSCO - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
BOSC - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
ADTN - FKWL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More