CSCCF
Price
$6.37
Change
-$0.15 (-2.30%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.61B
25 days until earnings call
GLNLF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
173.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSCCF vs GLNLF

Header iconCSCCF vs GLNLF Comparison
Open Charts CSCCF vs GLNLFBanner chart's image
CAPSTONE COPPER
Price$6.37
Change-$0.15 (-2.30%)
Volume$130.84K
Capitalization3.61B
GALAN LITHIUM
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization173.17M
CSCCF vs GLNLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSCCF vs. GLNLF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSCCF is a Hold and GLNLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSCCF: $6.37 vs. GLNLF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CSCCF and GLNLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSCCF: 49% vs. GLNLF: 182%
Market capitalization -- CSCCF: $3.61B vs. GLNLF: $173.17M
CSCCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.61B. GLNLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $173.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLNLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLNLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSCCF is a better buy in the long-term than GLNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSCCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLNLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLNLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLNLF is a better buy in the short-term than CSCCF.

Price Growth

CSCCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.15% price change this week, while GLNLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSCCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSCCF($3.61B) has a higher market cap than GLNLF($173M). CSCCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.392 vs. GLNLF (-5.263). CSCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. GLNLF (-6.54M). CSCCF has more cash in the bank: 101M vs. GLNLF (15.6M).
CSCCFGLNLFCSCCF / GLNLF
Capitalization3.61B173M2,086%
EBITDA311M-6.54M-4,758%
Gain YTD3.392-5.263-64%
P/E Ratio62.89N/A-
Revenue1.36BN/A-
Total Cash101M15.6M647%
Total Debt801MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSCCFGLNLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KARS22.410.31
+1.40%
KraneShares Eltc Vhl and Ft Mbly ETF
NDOW26.100.10
+0.38%
Anydrus Advantage ETF
VTEC97.580.14
+0.14%
Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
GAPR38.370.04
+0.09%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buf ETF - Apr
STAX25.32N/A
N/A
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF

CSCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSCCF has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSCCF jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSCCF
1D Price
Change %
CSCCF100%
-2.30%
LUNMF - CSCCF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
IVPAF - CSCCF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
FMCXF - CSCCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
BDNNY - CSCCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
ARREF - CSCCF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
More

GLNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNLF and MLGCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNLF and MLGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNLF
1D Price
Change %
GLNLF100%
N/A
MLGCF - GLNLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOCOF - GLNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UUSAF - GLNLF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSCCF - GLNLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
IPX - GLNLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More