CSBR
Price
$7.05
Change
-$0.02 (-0.28%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
97.9M
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHAT
Price
$17.66
Change
+$0.41 (+2.38%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSBR vs PHAT

Header iconCSBR vs PHAT Comparison
Open Charts CSBR vs PHATBanner chart's image
Champions Oncology
Price$7.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.28%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization97.9M
Phathom Pharmaceuticals
Price$17.66
Change+$0.41 (+2.38%)
Volume$356.8K
Capitalization1.26B
CSBR vs PHAT Comparison Chart in %
CSBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSBR vs. PHAT commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSBR is a Buy and PHAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CSBR: $7.05 vs. PHAT: $17.66)
Brand notoriety: CSBR and PHAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSBR: 27% vs. PHAT: 37%
Market capitalization -- CSBR: $97.9M vs. PHAT: $1.26B
CSBR [@Biotechnology] is valued at $97.9M. PHAT’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $117.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSBR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PHAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSBR is a better buy in the long-term than PHAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSBR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSBR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PHAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSBR is a better buy in the short-term than PHAT.

Price Growth

CSBR (@Biotechnology) experienced а +11.55% price change this week, while PHAT (@Biotechnology) price change was +14.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSBR is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

PHAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+2.88% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHAT($1.26B) has a higher market cap than CSBR($97.9M). PHAT YTD gains are higher at: 117.488 vs. CSBR (-17.736). CSBR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.56M vs. PHAT (-203.56M). PHAT has more cash in the bank: 135M vs. CSBR (10.3M). CSBR has less debt than PHAT: CSBR (5.75M) vs PHAT (210M). PHAT has higher revenues than CSBR: PHAT (147M) vs CSBR (56.9M).
CSBRPHATCSBR / PHAT
Capitalization97.9M1.26B8%
EBITDA4.56M-203.56M-2%
Gain YTD-17.736117.488-15%
P/E Ratio41.47N/A-
Revenue56.9M147M39%
Total Cash10.3M135M8%
Total Debt5.75M210M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSBR vs PHAT: Fundamental Ratings
CSBR
PHAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
11100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PHAT's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBR (85) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that PHAT’s stock grew similarly to CSBR’s over the last 12 months.

PHAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that PHAT’s stock grew similarly to CSBR’s over the last 12 months.

CSBR's SMR Rating (11) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHAT (100) in the null industry. This means that CSBR’s stock grew significantly faster than PHAT’s over the last 12 months.

PHAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBR (53) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that PHAT’s stock grew similarly to CSBR’s over the last 12 months.

CSBR's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHAT (100) in the null industry. This means that CSBR’s stock grew significantly faster than PHAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSBRPHAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDIBY20.440.03
+0.17%
MedioBanca SpA
NRBT0.05N/A
N/A
Novus Robotics, Inc.
JSGRY22.95N/A
N/A
LIXIL Corp.
FNBT38.25-0.40
-1.03%
FineMark Holdings, Inc.
SOUB15.26-0.20
-1.29%
Southpoint Bancshares Inc.

CSBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBR and SYRE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBR and SYRE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSBR
1D Price
Change %
CSBR100%
-0.28%
SYRE - CSBR
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
SCNI - CSBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
CVAC - CSBR
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
PHAT - CSBR
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
OABI - CSBR
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More

PHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHAT has been loosely correlated with RGNX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHAT jumps, then RGNX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHAT
1D Price
Change %
PHAT100%
+2.38%
RGNX - PHAT
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
QCLS - PHAT
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
URGN - PHAT
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.54%
ATRA - PHAT
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
RXRX - PHAT
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More