CSASF
Price
$19.89
Change
+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.78B
FAVO
Price
$1.77
Change
+$0.27 (+18.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
209.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSASF vs FAVO

Header iconCSASF vs FAVO Comparison
Open Charts CSASF vs FAVOBanner chart's image
Credit Saison
Price$19.89
Change+$4.09 (+25.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.78B
Favo Capital
Price$1.77
Change+$0.27 (+18.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization209.97M
CSASF vs FAVO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSASF vs. FAVO commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSASF is a StrongBuy and FAVO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CSASF: $19.89 vs. FAVO: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: CSASF and FAVO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSASF: 100% vs. FAVO: 9%
Market capitalization -- CSASF: $3.78B vs. FAVO: $209.97M
CSASF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $3.78B. FAVO’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $209.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $666.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFAVO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FAVO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSASF and FAVO are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAVO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAVO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CSASF (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FAVO (@Savings Banks) price change was +17.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.52% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSASF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than FAVO($210M). FAVO YTD gains are higher at: 607.717 vs. CSASF (0.000). CSASF has more cash in the bank: 99.4B vs. FAVO (1.08M). FAVO has less debt than CSASF: FAVO (31.4M) vs CSASF (3.25T).
CSASFFAVOCSASF / FAVO
Capitalization3.78B210M1,799%
EBITDA145BN/A-
Gain YTD0.000607.717-
P/E Ratio6.55N/A-
Revenue438BN/A-
Total Cash99.4B1.08M9,212,234%
Total Debt3.25T31.4M10,334,395%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSASF vs FAVO: Fundamental Ratings
CSASF
FAVO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
149
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7135
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3022

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAVO's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CSASF (16). This means that FAVO’s stock grew similarly to CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (49). This means that CSASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FAVO (100). This means that CSASF’s stock grew similarly to FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

FAVO's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSASF (71). This means that FAVO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSASF’s over the last 12 months.

CSASF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (100). This means that CSASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSASFFAVO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHU144.943.67
+2.60%
2x Ether ETF
BMEZ14.620.20
+1.39%
BlackRock Health Sciences Term Trust
UX28.95N/A
+0.01%
Roundhill Uranium ETF
BOCT47.24-0.10
-0.21%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct
XYLG28.24-0.09
-0.34%
Global X S&P 500® Covered Call & Gr ETF

CSASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSASF and ELEEF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSASF and ELEEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSASF
1D Price
Change %
CSASF100%
N/A
ELEEF - CSASF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
DWIS - CSASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMY - CSASF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
EDNMF - CSASF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPRF - CSASF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FAVO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAVO and RBRI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAVO and RBRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAVO
1D Price
Change %
FAVO100%
+18.00%
RBRI - FAVO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHMEF - FAVO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDNMF - FAVO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSASF - FAVO
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - FAVO
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More