CRZY
Price
$30.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
12.43M
DNSKF
Price
$35.00
Change
+$0.79 (+2.31%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
20.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRZY vs DNSKF

Header iconCRZY vs DNSKF Comparison
Open Charts CRZY vs DNSKFBanner chart's image
Crazy Woman Creek Ban
Price$30.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$396
Capitalization12.43M
Danske Bank A/S
Price$35.00
Change+$0.79 (+2.31%)
Volume$213
Capitalization20.43B
CRZY vs DNSKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRZY vs. DNSKF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRZY is a Hold and DNSKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CRZY: $30.13 vs. DNSKF: $35.00)
Brand notoriety: CRZY and DNSKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRZY: 162% vs. DNSKF: 99%
Market capitalization -- CRZY: $12.43M vs. DNSKF: $20.43B
CRZY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $12.43M. DNSKF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDNSKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the long-term than CRZY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRZY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNSKF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRZY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the short-term than CRZY.

Price Growth

CRZY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DNSKF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than CRZY($12.4M). DNSKF YTD gains are higher at: 18.004 vs. CRZY (-8.712).
CRZYDNSKFCRZY / DNSKF
Capitalization12.4M20.4B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.71218.004-48%
P/E RatioN/A312.50-
RevenueN/A52.3B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.06T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRZY vs DNSKF: Fundamental Ratings
CRZY
DNSKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
147
SMR RATING
1..100
592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7465
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRZY's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNSKF (84). This means that CRZY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CRZY (14). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to CRZY’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRZY (59). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRZY’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CRZY (59). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to CRZY’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as CRZY (74). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to CRZY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRZYDNSKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAUFF0.110.01
+12.47%
Blue Star Gold Corp.
GWBK0.07N/A
N/A
GATEWAY BK F S B OAKLAND CALIF
SRHYY0.20N/A
N/A
Syrah Resources Ltd.
NRSDY13.50N/A
N/A
NORDIC SEMICONDUCTOR ASA
TNABF3.35-0.10
-2.90%
Tenaga Nasional Berhad

CRZY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRZY has been loosely correlated with DNSKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRZY jumps, then DNSKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRZY
1D Price
Change %
CRZY100%
N/A
DNSKF - CRZY
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LUMB - CRZY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MBKL - CRZY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCB - CRZY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUY - CRZY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNSKF has been loosely correlated with CRZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNSKF jumps, then CRZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
CRZY - DNSKF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALBKF - DNSKF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBK - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OFG - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
FBP - DNSKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More