CRYBF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.51M
INTZ
Price
$2.04
Change
-$0.05 (-2.39%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRYBF vs INTZ

Header iconCRYBF vs INTZ Comparison
Open Charts CRYBF vs INTZBanner chart's image
Dynamite Blockchain
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$4.64K
Capitalization7.51M
Intrusion
Price$2.04
Change-$0.05 (-2.39%)
Volume$421.2K
Capitalization5.44M
CRYBF vs INTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRYBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRYBF vs. INTZ commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRYBF is a Hold and INTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CRYBF: $0.05 vs. INTZ: $2.04)
Brand notoriety: CRYBF and INTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRYBF: 9% vs. INTZ: 69%
Market capitalization -- CRYBF: $7.51M vs. INTZ: $5.44M
CRYBF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $7.51M. INTZ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRYBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRYBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • INTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, INTZ is a better buy in the long-term than CRYBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRYBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRYBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • INTZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRYBF is a better buy in the short-term than INTZ.

Price Growth

CRYBF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while INTZ (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.69% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRYBF($7.51M) has a higher market cap than INTZ($5.44M). INTZ YTD gains are higher at: -33.659 vs. CRYBF (-48.226). CRYBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.51M vs. INTZ (-12.51M). CRYBF has less debt than INTZ: CRYBF (53.1K) vs INTZ (12.3M). INTZ has higher revenues than CRYBF: INTZ (5.69M) vs CRYBF (0).
CRYBFINTZCRYBF / INTZ
Capitalization7.51M5.44M138%
EBITDA-6.51M-12.51M52%
Gain YTD-48.226-33.659143%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue05.69M-
Total Cash4.22KN/A-
Total Debt53.1K12.3M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRYBF vs INTZ: Fundamental Ratings
CRYBF
INTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7784
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6044
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRYBF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (92). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRYBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (100). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRYBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (100). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CRYBF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (84). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.

INTZ's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CRYBF (60). This means that INTZ’s stock grew similarly to CRYBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRYBFINTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRYBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAKSF4.540.25
+5.83%
Marks & Spencer Group Plc
FTCO3.760.17
+4.72%
Fortitude Gold Corporation
LBTSF13.36N/A
N/A
Almirall SA
GMLPF0.90-0.10
-10.00%
Golar LNG Partners LP
EBZT0.44-0.06
-12.30%
EVERYTHING BLOCKCHAIN INC.

CRYBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRYBF and CORZ have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRYBF and CORZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRYBF
1D Price
Change %
CRYBF100%
+3.91%
CORZ - CRYBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
XROLF - CRYBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTZ - CRYBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
AI - CRYBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
BAINF - CRYBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

INTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTZ has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTZ jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTZ
1D Price
Change %
INTZ100%
-2.39%
BMR - INTZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.20%
HUBC - INTZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
REKR - INTZ
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
LIDR - INTZ
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
LPSN - INTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.50%
More