Advertisement
CRYBF vs INTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRYBF is a Hold and INTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRYBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRYBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- INTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRYBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRYBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRYBF (@Computer Communications) experienced а +10.71% price change this week, while INTZ (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRYBF | INTZ | CRYBF / INTZ | |
| Capitalization | 7.36M | 33.6M | 22% |
| EBITDA | -5.38M | -6.29M | 85% |
| Gain YTD | -59.039 | -45.041 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.01 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.09K | 6.42M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.2K | 10.7M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.38M | 1.99M | 69% |
CRYBF | INTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRYBF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (98). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.
CRYBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (100). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.
CRYBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as INTZ (100). This means that CRYBF’s stock grew similarly to INTZ’s over the last 12 months.
INTZ's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CRYBF (64). This means that INTZ’s stock grew similarly to CRYBF’s over the last 12 months.
INTZ's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CRYBF (60). This means that INTZ’s stock grew similarly to CRYBF’s over the last 12 months.
| CRYBF | INTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
CRYBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRYBF and CORZ have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRYBF and CORZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRYBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRYBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CORZ - CRYBF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| XROLF - CRYBF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INTZ - CRYBF | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.05% | ||
| AI - CRYBF | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
| BAINF - CRYBF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
INTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTZ has been loosely correlated with BMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTZ jumps, then BMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTZ | 100% | +3.05% | ||
| BMR - INTZ | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| REKR - INTZ | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| HUBC - INTZ | 39% Loosely correlated | +11.55% | ||
| LIDR - INTZ | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| LPSN - INTZ | 34% Loosely correlated | +5.22% | ||
More | ||||