Advertisement
CRWOF vs JGCCY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWOF is a Hold and JGCCY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJGCCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CRWOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- JGCCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JGCCY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
- JGCCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWOF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.58% price change this week, while JGCCY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +5.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.43%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+3.52% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| CRWOF | JGCCY | CRWOF / JGCCY | |
| Capitalization | 17.9B | 3.17B | 564% |
| EBITDA | 30.6B | 22.2B | 138% |
| Gain YTD | 0.583 | 7.300 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.70 | 18.46 | 20% |
| Revenue | 1.12T | 833B | 134% |
| Total Cash | 204B | 305B | 67% |
| Total Debt | 587B | 34.4B | 1,706% |
CRWOF | JGCCY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 49 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRWOF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JGCCY (45). This means that CRWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JGCCY’s over the last 12 months.
JGCCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWOF (71). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.
JGCCY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWOF (78). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.
JGCCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWOF (58). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.
JGCCY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWOF (28). This means that JGCCY’s stock grew similarly to CRWOF’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWOF | JGCCY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EFAV | 87.37 | 0.16 | +0.18% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | |||
| LDRH | 25.01 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | |||
| FEBP | 32.16 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Feb | |||
| FSMB | 20.13 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| First Trust Short Dur Mgd Muncpl ETF | |||
| WCBR | 27.26 | -0.31 | -1.12% |
| WisdomTree Cybersecurity ETF | |||
CRWOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWOF and OBSJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWOF and OBSJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OBSJF - CRWOF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JGCCY - CRWOF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PWR - CRWOF | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.27% | ||
| ESOA - CRWOF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| EFGSY - CRWOF | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.65% | ||
More | ||||
JGCCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that JGCCY and JGCCF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JGCCY and JGCCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JGCCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGCCY | 100% | N/A | ||
| JGCCF - JGCCY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KLRGF - JGCCY | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DY - JGCCY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| AEGXF - JGCCY | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
| SLND - JGCCY | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
More | ||||