CRWD
Price
$477.11
Change
-$1.73 (-0.36%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
120.28B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
S
Price
$14.85
Change
+$0.10 (+0.68%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.05B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWD vs S

Header iconCRWD vs S Comparison
Open Charts CRWD vs SBanner chart's image
CrowdStrike Holdings
Price$477.11
Change-$1.73 (-0.36%)
Volume$745.1K
Capitalization120.28B
SentinelOne
Price$14.85
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
Volume$3.22M
Capitalization5.05B
CRWD vs S Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWD vs. S commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Hold and S is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWD: $477.11 vs. S: $14.85)
Brand notoriety: CRWD and S are both notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWD: 32% vs. S: 42%
Market capitalization -- CRWD: $120.28B vs. S: $5.05B
CRWD [@Computer Communications] is valued at $120.28B. S’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $5.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.63T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRWD is a better buy in the long-term than S.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • S’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the short-term than CRWD.

Price Growth

CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWD is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

S is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.52% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWD($120B) has a higher market cap than S($5.05B). CRWD YTD gains are higher at: 39.441 vs. S (-33.108). CRWD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 57.2M vs. S (-212.54M). CRWD has more cash in the bank: 4.8B vs. S (650M). S has less debt than CRWD: S (10.3M) vs CRWD (818M). CRWD has higher revenues than S: CRWD (4.57B) vs S (956M).
CRWDSCRWD / S
Capitalization120B5.05B2,378%
EBITDA57.2M-212.54M-27%
Gain YTD39.441-33.108-119%
P/E Ratio765.02N/A-
Revenue4.57B956M478%
Total Cash4.8B650M739%
Total Debt818M10.3M7,942%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWD vs S: Fundamental Ratings
CRWD
S
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1910
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2988
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
681
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

S's Valuation (71) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CRWD (99) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for S (88) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than S’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as S (96) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as S (82) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (68) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
S
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVDS27.500.14
+0.51%
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
EQAL53.260.19
+0.36%
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
YJUN25.660.04
+0.18%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bf ETF June
EWJ81.00-0.14
-0.17%
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
SMCL4.96-0.08
-1.59%
GraniteShares 2x Long SMCI Daily ETF

CRWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWD
1D Price
Change %
CRWD100%
-0.36%
ZS - CRWD
72%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
PANW - CRWD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
NOW - CRWD
68%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
NET - CRWD
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
CYBR - CRWD
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
+0.68%
HUBS - S
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
COIN - S
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
CLSK - S
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
CRM - S
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CRWD - S
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More