CRWD
Price
$480.62
Change
-$1.11 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
77.29B
79 days until earnings call
PANW
Price
$196.27
Change
-$1.40 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
90.22B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWD vs PANW

Header iconCRWD vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts CRWD vs PANWBanner chart's image
CrowdStrike Holdings
Price$480.62
Change-$1.11 (-0.23%)
Volume$2.61M
Capitalization77.29B
Palo Alto Networks
Price$196.27
Change-$1.40 (-0.71%)
Volume$3.82M
Capitalization90.22B
CRWD vs PANW Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWD vs. PANW commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a StrongBuy and PANW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWD: $480.62 vs. PANW: $196.27)
Brand notoriety: CRWD and PANW are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWD: 68% vs. PANW: 77%
Market capitalization -- CRWD: $77.29B vs. PANW: $90.22B
CRWD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $77.29B. PANW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $90.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than CRWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PANW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the short-term than CRWD.

Price Growth

CRWD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while PANW (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2025.

PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.65% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($90.2B) has a higher market cap than CRWD($77.3B). CRWD has higher P/E ratio than PANW: CRWD (863.62) vs PANW (43.23). CRWD YTD gains are higher at: 40.466 vs. PANW (7.864). PANW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. CRWD (294M). CRWD (3.48B) and PANW (3.37B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CRWD has less debt than PANW: CRWD (793M) vs PANW (2.18B). PANW has higher revenues than CRWD: PANW (7.53B) vs CRWD (3.06B).
CRWDPANWCRWD / PANW
Capitalization77.3B90.2B86%
EBITDA294M1.15B25%
Gain YTD40.4667.864515%
P/E Ratio863.6243.231,998%
Revenue3.06B7.53B41%
Total Cash3.48B3.37B103%
Total Debt793M2.18B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWD vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
CRWD
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1810
SMR RATING
1..100
9143
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PANW's Valuation (84) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (95) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (18) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's SMR Rating (43) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (91) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PANW (48) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (69) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWDPANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMRC0.64N/A
+0.06%
Texas Mineral Resources Corp.
FNMAH10.25-0.05
-0.49%
Fannie Mae
KHNGY45.78-0.46
-1.00%
Kuehne & Nagel International AG
HEGIY13.82-0.20
-1.43%
Hengan International Group Co., Ltd.
DVCMY6.55-0.19
-2.75%
DAVIDE CAMPARI MILANO N V

CRWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWD
1D Price
Change %
CRWD100%
-0.23%
ZS - CRWD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
PANW - CRWD
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
CYBR - CRWD
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
NET - CRWD
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
HUBS - CRWD
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
More

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
-0.71%
ZS - PANW
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
CYBR - PANW
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
S - PANW
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
CRM - PANW
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
ADSK - PANW
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
More