CRWD
Price
$423.70
Change
-$18.30 (-4.14%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
106.33B
92 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$483.17
Change
+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
25.46B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWD vs HUBS

Header iconCRWD vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts CRWD vs HUBSBanner chart's image
CrowdStrike Holdings
Price$423.70
Change-$18.30 (-4.14%)
Volume$5.49M
Capitalization106.33B
HUBSPOT
Price$483.17
Change+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Volume$817.6K
Capitalization25.46B
CRWD vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWD vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Hold and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWD: $423.70 vs. HUBS: $483.17)
Brand notoriety: CRWD: Notable vs. HUBS: Not notable
CRWD represents the Computer Communications, while HUBS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWD: 180% vs. HUBS: 91%
Market capitalization -- CRWD: $106.33B vs. HUBS: $25.46B
CRWD [@Computer Communications] is valued at $106.33B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRWD is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than CRWD.

Price Growth

CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWD is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.17% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWD($106B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($25.5B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CRWD: HUBS (7023.44) vs CRWD (765.02). CRWD YTD gains are higher at: 23.831 vs. HUBS (-30.656). CRWD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 167M vs. HUBS (126M). CRWD has more cash in the bank: 4.61B vs. HUBS (1.67B). HUBS has less debt than CRWD: HUBS (281M) vs CRWD (785M). CRWD has higher revenues than HUBS: CRWD (4.14B) vs HUBS (2.85B).
CRWDHUBSCRWD / HUBS
Capitalization106B25.5B416%
EBITDA167M126M133%
Gain YTD23.831-30.656-78%
P/E Ratio765.027023.4411%
Revenue4.14B2.85B145%
Total Cash4.61B1.67B276%
Total Debt785M281M279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWD vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
CRWD
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2970
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5584
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWD's Valuation (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (70) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (94) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWDHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIAP217.39N/A
N/A
LifeX 2057 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
LSAF44.32-0.15
-0.34%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
SNAV33.52-0.18
-0.53%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
DSI121.40-0.91
-0.74%
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF
IGPT50.88-0.71
-1.37%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF

CRWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWD
1D Price
Change %
CRWD100%
-4.14%
PANW - CRWD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
ZS - CRWD
68%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
NET - CRWD
67%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
NOW - CRWD
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
HUBS - CRWD
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.43%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More