CRVL vs MMC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRVL is a Hold and MMC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRVL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CRVL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- MMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRVL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRVL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRVL (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -2.10% price change this week, while MMC (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -1.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +4.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRVL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
MMC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (+4.75% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| CRVL | MMC | CRVL / MMC | |
| Capitalization | 4.5B | 101B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 121M | 6.32B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 41.697 | 14.158 | 295% |
| P/E Ratio | 59.55 | 27.08 | 220% |
| Revenue | 774M | 22.7B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 107M | 3.36B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 32.4M | 15.4B | 0% |
CRVL | MMC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MMC's Valuation (94) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as CRVL (98). This means that MMC’s stock grew similarly to CRVL’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MMC (7). This means that CRVL’s stock grew similarly to MMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's SMR Rating (28) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MMC (30). This means that CRVL’s stock grew similarly to MMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MMC (57). This means that CRVL’s stock grew similarly to MMC’s over the last 12 months.
CRVL's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMC (57). This means that CRVL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMC’s over the last 12 months.
| CRVL | MMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 42% |
CRVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRVL and SLQT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRVL and SLQT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRVL | 100% | -4.36% | ||
| SLQT - CRVL | 27% Poorly correlated | +21.38% | ||
| EHTH - CRVL | 27% Poorly correlated | +41.03% | ||
| ERIE - CRVL | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| BRO - CRVL | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| MMC - CRVL | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||
MMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMC has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MMC jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.