Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRTC vs SMH
CRTC vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CRTC vs SMH
Xtrackers US National Crtcl Techs ETF
Price$37.02
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
Volume$1.54K
Net Assets113.47M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$365.86
Change+$1.69 (+0.46%)
Volume$2.92M
Net Assets37.57B
CRTC vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRTC vs. SMH commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRTC is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. CRTC (113M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CRTC: SMH (51.076) vs CRTC (19.499). CRTC was incepted earlier than SMH: CRTC (2 years) vs SMH (14 years). CRTC (0.35) and SMH (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . CRTC has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| CRTC | SMH | CRTC / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.499 | 51.076 | 38% |
| Net Assets | 113M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 15.00 | 193% |
| Yield | 1.01 | 0.30 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CRTC | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 60% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CRTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRTC has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRTC jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTC | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| PH - CRTC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| DD - CRTC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| EMR - CRTC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| KLAC - CRTC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| META - CRTC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||