CRTAF
Price
$12.25
Change
+$0.42 (+3.55%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
110.7M
CSLMF
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRTAF vs CSLMF

Header iconCRTAF vs CSLMF Comparison
Open Charts CRTAF vs CSLMFBanner chart's image
Cartica Acquisition
Price$12.25
Change+$0.42 (+3.55%)
Volume$175
Capitalization110.7M
CSLM Acquisition
Price$12.05
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Volume$6.31K
Capitalization105.06M
CRTAF vs CSLMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRTAF vs. CSLMF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRTAF is a Buy and CSLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CRTAF: $12.25 vs. CSLMF: $12.05)
Brand notoriety: CRTAF and CSLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRTAF: 121% vs. CSLMF: 109%
Market capitalization -- CRTAF: $110.7M vs. CSLMF: $105.06M
CRTAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $110.7M. CSLMF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $105.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSLMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRTAF and CSLMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRTAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSLMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRTAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSLMF is a better buy in the short-term than CRTAF.

Price Growth

CRTAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRTAF($111M) has a higher market cap than CSLMF($105M). CRTAF has higher P/E ratio than CSLMF: CRTAF (39.35) vs CSLMF (16.93). CSLMF YTD gains are higher at: 4.783 vs. CRTAF (3.638). CSLMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. CRTAF (-1.8M). CSLMF has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. CRTAF (21.3K). CRTAF has less debt than CSLMF: CRTAF (100K) vs CSLMF (600K). CRTAF (0) and CSLMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CRTAFCSLMFCRTAF / CSLMF
Capitalization111M105M106%
EBITDA-1.8M-1.14M158%
Gain YTD3.6384.78376%
P/E Ratio39.3516.93232%
Revenue00-
Total Cash21.3K174K12%
Total Debt100K600K17%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRTAFCSLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
2%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
2%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMAGX84.210.69
+0.83%
Amana Growth Investor
UIVCX12.610.09
+0.72%
MFS Intrinsic Value C
JPIVX31.790.18
+0.57%
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val I
ERSTX26.650.11
+0.41%
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value R
RSEIX14.770.05
+0.34%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Instl

CRTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRTAF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRTAF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRTAF
1D Price
Change %
CRTAF100%
N/A
HSPO - CRTAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
KACLF - CRTAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRTLF - CRTAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLTYF - CRTAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSPOU - CRTAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
WELNF - CSLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - CSLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTAF - CSLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IX - CSLMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More