CRS
Price
$233.47
Change
-$5.53 (-2.31%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.91B
29 days until earnings call
ESAB
Price
$108.16
Change
-$1.29 (-1.18%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.64B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRS vs ESAB

Header iconCRS vs ESAB Comparison
Open Charts CRS vs ESABBanner chart's image
Carpenter Technology
Price$233.47
Change-$5.53 (-2.31%)
Volume$8.36K
Capitalization11.91B
ESAB
Price$108.16
Change-$1.29 (-1.18%)
Volume$3.58K
Capitalization6.64B
CRS vs ESAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRS vs. ESAB commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRS is a Hold and ESAB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CRS: $238.99 vs. ESAB: $109.45)
Brand notoriety: CRS and ESAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRS: 122% vs. ESAB: 162%
Market capitalization -- CRS: $11.91B vs. ESAB: $6.64B
CRS [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $11.91B. ESAB’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $6.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRS is a better buy in the long-term than ESAB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESAB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ESAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESAB is a better buy in the short-term than CRS.

Price Growth

CRS (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while ESAB (@Metal Fabrication) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

ESAB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-1.73% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRS($11.9B) has a higher market cap than ESAB($6.64B). CRS has higher P/E ratio than ESAB: CRS (32.21) vs ESAB (23.95). CRS YTD gains are higher at: 41.249 vs. ESAB (-8.608). CRS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 670M vs. ESAB (507M). CRS has more cash in the bank: 316M vs. ESAB (258M). CRS has less debt than ESAB: CRS (703M) vs ESAB (1.17B). CRS (2.88B) and ESAB (2.74B) have equivalent revenues.
CRSESABCRS / ESAB
Capitalization11.9B6.64B179%
EBITDA670M507M132%
Gain YTD41.249-8.608-479%
P/E Ratio32.2123.95134%
Revenue2.88B2.74B105%
Total Cash316M258M122%
Total Debt703M1.17B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRS: Fundamental Ratings
CRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRSESAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QQLV24.470.02
+0.07%
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
EMDV46.61N/A
N/A
ProShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Div Growers
REVS27.83N/A
-0.01%
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
IDMO53.27-0.28
-0.52%
Invesco S&P International Dev Momt ETF
TDF11.30-0.16
-1.40%
Templeton Dragon Fund

CRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with ATI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then ATI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRS
1D Price
Change %
CRS100%
-1.54%
ATI - CRS
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
MLI - CRS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
NWPX - CRS
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
GFF - CRS
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
ESAB - CRS
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

ESAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESAB has been loosely correlated with NWPX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESAB jumps, then NWPX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESAB
1D Price
Change %
ESAB100%
-1.22%
NWPX - ESAB
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
MLI - ESAB
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CRS - ESAB
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
GFF - ESAB
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
CODI - ESAB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More