CRRTF vs ECGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRRTF is a Hold and ECGS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRRTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileECGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRRTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ECGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CRRTF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ECGS (@Tobacco) price change was +122.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tobacco industry was +10.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.66%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.78% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Tobacco (+10.77% weekly)The industry is engaged in the growth, preparation for sale, advertisement, and distribution of tobacco and tobacco-related products like cigarettes. In 2017, tobacco companies spent an estimated $9.36 billion marketing cigarettes and smokeless tobacco in the U.S. – an amount that translates to more than $25 million each day (according to a CDC report). Philip Morris International Inc., Altria Group Inc., and British American Tobacco plc are some major cigar makers. In recent times, vaping or the use of e-cigarette (does not burn tobacco) is gaining momentum – several established cigarette makers are trying to expand their footprint in this new market.
| CRRTF | ECGS | CRRTF / ECGS | |
| Capitalization | 6.47M | 6.34M | 102% |
| EBITDA | 61K | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.118 | 206.122 | -6% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.48 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 17.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 9.39M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.25M | N/A | - |
CRRTF | ECGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRRTF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECGS (93). This means that CRRTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECGS’s over the last 12 months.
ECGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRTF (100). This means that ECGS’s stock grew similarly to CRRTF’s over the last 12 months.
CRRTF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ECGS (100). This means that CRRTF’s stock grew similarly to ECGS’s over the last 12 months.
ECGS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CRRTF (51). This means that ECGS’s stock grew similarly to CRRTF’s over the last 12 months.
CRRTF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as ECGS (100). This means that CRRTF’s stock grew similarly to ECGS’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CRRTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRRTF has been loosely correlated with LIFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRRTF jumps, then LIFD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRRTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRRTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIFD - CRRTF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SIGA - CRRTF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ELTP - CRRTF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CVSI - CRRTF | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.91% | ||
| ECGS - CRRTF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ECGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECGS and GRUSF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECGS and GRUSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRUSF - ECGS | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| CXXIF - ECGS | 7% Poorly correlated | +4.92% | ||
| ELTP - ECGS | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CRRTF - ECGS | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CTTH - ECGS | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||