CRPJF
Price
$2.33
Change
+$0.08 (+3.56%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
10.4B
CUPUF
Price
$13.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
444.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRPJF vs CUPUF

Header iconCRPJF vs CUPUF Comparison
Open Charts CRPJF vs CUPUFBanner chart's image
China Resources Power Holdings
Price$2.33
Change+$0.08 (+3.56%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization10.4B
Caribbean Utilities
Price$13.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$21.99K
Capitalization444.11M
CRPJF vs CUPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRPJF vs. CUPUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRPJF is a Hold and CUPUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CRPJF: $2.33 vs. CUPUF: $13.02)
Brand notoriety: CRPJF and CUPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRPJF: 100% vs. CUPUF: 781%
Market capitalization -- CRPJF: $10.4B vs. CUPUF: $444.11M
CRPJF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $10.4B. CUPUF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $444.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRPJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCUPUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRPJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CUPUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUPUF is a better buy in the long-term than CRPJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUPUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUPUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CRPJF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CUPUF (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.89% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRPJF($10.4B) has a higher market cap than CUPUF($444M). CUPUF has higher P/E ratio than CRPJF: CUPUF (13.59) vs CRPJF (11.35). CRPJF YTD gains are higher at: 3.556 vs. CUPUF (-4.263). CRPJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.1B vs. CUPUF (79M). CRPJF has more cash in the bank: 7.93B vs. CUPUF (4.09M). CUPUF has less debt than CRPJF: CUPUF (374M) vs CRPJF (136B). CRPJF has higher revenues than CUPUF: CRPJF (89.8B) vs CUPUF (287M).
CRPJFCUPUFCRPJF / CUPUF
Capitalization10.4B444M2,342%
EBITDA20.1B79M25,443%
Gain YTD3.556-4.263-83%
P/E Ratio11.3513.5984%
Revenue89.8B287M31,289%
Total Cash7.93B4.09M193,843%
Total Debt136B374M36,364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRPJF vs CUPUF: Fundamental Ratings
CRPJF
CUPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5090
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6872
SMR RATING
1..100
8861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9270
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRPJF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CUPUF (27). This means that CRPJF’s stock grew similarly to CUPUF’s over the last 12 months.

CRPJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CUPUF (72). This means that CRPJF’s stock grew similarly to CUPUF’s over the last 12 months.

CUPUF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CRPJF (88). This means that CUPUF’s stock grew similarly to CRPJF’s over the last 12 months.

CUPUF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CRPJF (61). This means that CUPUF’s stock grew similarly to CRPJF’s over the last 12 months.

CUPUF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CRPJF (92). This means that CUPUF’s stock grew similarly to CRPJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRPJFCUPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHCI10.840.47
+4.53%
Comstock Holding Companies
BBCP6.430.10
+1.58%
Concrete Pumping Holdings
CHCO128.881.53
+1.20%
City Holding Company
DDS455.815.38
+1.19%
Dillards
MNSBP24.20N/A
N/A
MainStreet Bancshares

CRPJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRPJF has been closely correlated with AEMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRPJF jumps, then AEMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRPJF
1D Price
Change %
CRPJF100%
N/A
AEMMY - CRPJF
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
CPYYY - CRPJF
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
DIPGF - CRPJF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEZF - CRPJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUPUF - CRPJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CUPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUPUF and CPYYY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUPUF and CPYYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUPUF
1D Price
Change %
CUPUF100%
N/A
CPYYY - CUPUF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
CRPJY - CUPUF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELCPF - CUPUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPYYF - CUPUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDPFY - CUPUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More