CRML
Price
$4.92
Change
+$0.29 (+6.26%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
456.53M
TMC
Price
$5.34
Change
-$0.18 (-3.26%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.25B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRML vs TMC

Header iconCRML vs TMC Comparison
Open Charts CRML vs TMCBanner chart's image
Critical Metals
Price$4.92
Change+$0.29 (+6.26%)
Volume$23.31K
Capitalization456.53M
TMC the metals
Price$5.34
Change-$0.18 (-3.26%)
Volume$88.83K
Capitalization2.25B
CRML vs TMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRML vs. TMC commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRML is a Hold and TMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CRML: $4.63 vs. TMC: $5.62)
Brand notoriety: CRML and TMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRML: 116% vs. TMC: 45%
Market capitalization -- CRML: $456.53M vs. TMC: $2.25B
CRML [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $456.53M. TMC’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRML’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRML is a better buy in the long-term than TMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRML’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRML’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMC is a better buy in the short-term than CRML.

Price Growth

CRML (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +21.52% price change this week, while TMC (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

TMC is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.97% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMC($2.25B) has a higher market cap than CRML($457M). TMC YTD gains are higher at: 401.786 vs. CRML (-31.811). TMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -73.6M vs. CRML (-158.99M). TMC has more cash in the bank: 2.35M vs. CRML (149K). TMC has less debt than CRML: TMC (9.98M) vs CRML (15M). CRML (0) and TMC (0) have equivalent revenues.
CRMLTMCCRML / TMC
Capitalization457M2.25B20%
EBITDA-158.99M-73.6M216%
Gain YTD-31.811401.786-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash149K2.35M6%
Total Debt15M9.98M150%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMLTMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDECX23.600.20
+0.85%
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development C
UEPSX19.020.08
+0.42%
ProFunds Europe 30 Svc
LFGSX41.850.16
+0.38%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R4
FIUSX33.70-0.02
-0.06%
Macquarie Opportunity A
GTMRX18.33-0.15
-0.81%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R

CRML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRML and MP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRML and MP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRML
1D Price
Change %
CRML100%
+9.46%
MP - CRML
32%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%
FURY - CRML
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
TMC - CRML
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
TECK - CRML
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
VZLA - CRML
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More

TMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMC has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMC jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMC
1D Price
Change %
TMC100%
+1.81%
MP - TMC
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
USAR - TMC
31%
Poorly correlated
+8.11%
UAMY - TMC
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
CRML - TMC
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.46%
GTI - TMC
23%
Poorly correlated
-18.79%
More