CRML
Price
$8.85
Change
-$0.86 (-8.86%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NB
Price
$5.42
Change
-$0.71 (-11.56%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
688.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRML vs NB

Header iconCRML vs NB Comparison
Open Charts CRML vs NBBanner chart's image
Critical Metals
Price$8.85
Change-$0.86 (-8.86%)
Volume$39.46K
Capitalization1.14B
NioCorp Developments
Price$5.42
Change-$0.71 (-11.56%)
Volume$146.09K
Capitalization688.57M
CRML vs NB Comparison Chart in %
CRML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRML vs. NB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRML is a Hold and NB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CRML: $9.71 vs. NB: $6.14)
Brand notoriety: CRML and NB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRML: 38% vs. NB: 63%
Market capitalization -- CRML: $1.14B vs. NB: $688.57M
CRML [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.14B. NB’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $688.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRML’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRML’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRML is a better buy in the long-term than NB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRML’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRML’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRML is a better buy in the short-term than NB.

Price Growth

CRML (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.14% price change this week, while NB (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRML($1.14B) has a higher market cap than NB($689M). NB YTD gains are higher at: 296.129 vs. CRML (43.004).
CRMLNBCRML / NB
Capitalization1.14B689M166%
EBITDAN/A-8.66M-
Gain YTD43.004296.12915%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.29M-
Total DebtN/A150K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NB: Fundamental Ratings
NB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMLNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFEAX61.050.39
+0.64%
Janus Henderson European Focus A
SDVGX18.470.07
+0.38%
Sit Dividend Growth I
SVAIX6.59N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div IS
RYCIX142.51-0.06
-0.04%
Rydex Consumer Products Inv
IVHIX5.94-0.02
-0.34%
Macquarie High Income Fund Class I

CRML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRML has been loosely correlated with LGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRML jumps, then LGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRML
1D Price
Change %
CRML100%
-0.61%
LGO - CRML
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
WWR - CRML
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
MP - CRML
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
NMG - CRML
32%
Poorly correlated
+12.19%
ELBM - CRML
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NB has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NB jumps, then MP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NB
1D Price
Change %
NB100%
+2.68%
MP - NB
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
UAMY - NB
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.58%
USAR - NB
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.78%
CRML - NB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
TMC - NB
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
More