CRM
Price
$266.08
Change
+$0.82 (+0.31%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
249.32B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$88.04
Change
+$0.25 (+0.28%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
26.07B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRM vs ZM

Header iconCRM vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts CRM vs ZMBanner chart's image
Salesforce
Price$266.08
Change+$0.82 (+0.31%)
Volume$2.46M
Capitalization249.32B
Zoom Communications
Price$88.04
Change+$0.25 (+0.28%)
Volume$1.19M
Capitalization26.07B
CRM vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRM vs. ZM commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a Buy and ZM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CRM: $266.08 vs. ZM: $88.04)
Brand notoriety: CRM and ZM are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRM: 32% vs. ZM: 41%
Market capitalization -- CRM: $249.32B vs. ZM: $26.07B
CRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $249.32B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $26.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $285.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRM is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRM($249B) has a higher market cap than ZM($26.1B). CRM has higher P/E ratio than ZM: CRM (35.52) vs ZM (17.13). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 7.879 vs. CRM (-20.024). CRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.3B vs. ZM (1.23B). CRM has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. ZM (7.94B). ZM has less debt than CRM: ZM (48.5M) vs CRM (11.1B). CRM has higher revenues than ZM: CRM (40.3B) vs ZM (4.81B).
CRMZMCRM / ZM
Capitalization249B26.1B954%
EBITDA12.3B1.23B998%
Gain YTD-20.0247.879-254%
P/E Ratio35.5217.13207%
Revenue40.3B4.81B839%
Total Cash11.3B7.94B142%
Total Debt11.1B48.5M22,887%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRM vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
CRM
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2420
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
6350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8889
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRM's Valuation (25) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (79). This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ZM (100). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRM (63). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRM (49). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ZM (89). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRV40.720.31
+0.77%
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
JADE62.660.40
+0.65%
JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF
XLV156.050.25
+0.16%
State Street®HlthCrSelSectSPDR®ETF
ITDG38.010.03
+0.09%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF
QQQJ37.50-0.14
-0.37%
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

CRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRM
1D Price
Change %
CRM100%
+0.31%
NOW - CRM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
HUBS - CRM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
DT - CRM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
FRSH - CRM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
TEAM - CRM
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
+0.28%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
FRSH - ZM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
RNG - ZM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
CRM - ZM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More