Advertisement
CRM vs PSQH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a Buy and PSQH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSQH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PSQH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSQH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- PSQH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while PSQH (@Packaged Software) price change was +20.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +187.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+4.29% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | PSQH | CRM / PSQH | |
| Capitalization | 233B | 111M | 209,910% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -38.41M | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.492 | -46.916 | 56% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.55 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 27.6M | - |
| Total Cash | 1.8B | 20.6M | 8,738% |
| Total Debt | 11.4B | 33.3M | 34,234% |
CRM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRM | PSQH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 35% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 30% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 60% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 37% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 19% |
Advertisement
CRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| ADSK - CRM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| DT - CRM | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| TEAM - CRM | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
More | ||||
PSQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSQH has been loosely correlated with RUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSQH jumps, then RUM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSQH | 100% | +2.55% | ||
| RUM - PSQH | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| PRCH - PSQH | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
| NCCGF - PSQH | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| REKR - PSQH | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| CRM - PSQH | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||