It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.08% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.01%.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+1.85% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
CRM | PANW | CRM / PANW | |
Capitalization | 230B | 112B | 205% |
EBITDA | 11.4B | 1.66B | 687% |
Gain YTD | -27.835 | -8.189 | 340% |
P/E Ratio | 37.64 | 96.01 | 39% |
Revenue | 38.6B | 8.88B | 435% |
Total Cash | 17.4B | 3.3B | 527% |
Total Debt | 11.4B | 729M | 1,564% |
CRM | PANW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (22) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (86) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (76) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (43) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRM (68) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRM (64) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM | PANW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% | 4 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | 4 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago63% | 4 days ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago73% | 15 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 5 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CRM | 100% | -0.15% | ||
NOW - CRM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
HUBS - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.63% | ||
ADSK - CRM | 68% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
TEAM - CRM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
S - CRM | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PANW | 100% | -0.62% | ||
CRWD - PANW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
ZS - PANW | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
ADSK - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
NOW - PANW | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
CRM - PANW | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More |