Advertisement
CRM vs OOMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a StrongBuy and OOMA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOOMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OOMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OOMA’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- OOMA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -14.07% price change this week, while OOMA (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
OOMA is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-7.11% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | OOMA | CRM / OOMA | |
| Capitalization | 184B | 317M | 58,044% |
| EBITDA | 12.3B | 14.9M | 82,550% |
| Gain YTD | -25.869 | -2.046 | 1,264% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.22 | 143.63 | 18% |
| Revenue | 40.3B | 264M | 15,265% |
| Total Cash | 11.3B | 21.7M | 52,074% |
| Total Debt | 11.1B | 15.2M | 73,026% |
CRM | OOMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (23) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OOMA (82) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OOMA (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as OOMA (87) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to OOMA’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CRM (65) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OOMA’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
OOMA's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | OOMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
Advertisement
CRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -6.85% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -10.55% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 69% Closely correlated | -10.60% | ||
| DT - CRM | 68% Closely correlated | -9.15% | ||
| TEAM - CRM | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.65% | ||
More | ||||
OOMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OOMA has been loosely correlated with ONTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OOMA jumps, then ONTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OOMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOMA | 100% | -3.85% | ||
| ONTF - OOMA | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ALRM - OOMA | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.98% | ||
| FRSH - OOMA | 49% Loosely correlated | -10.60% | ||
| CXM - OOMA | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.56% | ||
| CRM - OOMA | 45% Loosely correlated | -6.85% | ||
More | ||||