Advertisement
CRM vs FRSH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a Buy and FRSH is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.10% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +157.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.33% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | FRSH | CRM / FRSH | |
| Capitalization | 198B | 3.01B | 6,587% |
| EBITDA | 12.3B | -14.64M | -83,993% |
| Gain YTD | -20.422 | -12.980 | 157% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 40.3B | 811M | 4,969% |
| Total Cash | 11.3B | 813M | 1,390% |
| Total Debt | 11.1B | 39.7M | 27,960% |
CRM | FRSH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 20 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (23) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (56) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CRM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (91) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (81) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | FRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INTW | 67.66 | 6.18 | +10.05% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | |||
| BKCI | 52.90 | 0.37 | +0.70% |
| BNY Mellon Concentrated Internatnl ETF | |||
| PUTD | 21.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Cboe Validus S&P 500 Dynamic PutWrite Index ETF | |||
| TLT | 86.55 | -0.25 | -0.29% |
| iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| FXU | 46.07 | -0.54 | -1.16% |
| First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
CRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| DT - CRM | 68% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with AMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then AMPL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| AMPL - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| DT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 66% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
More | ||||