CRLFF
Price
$5.43
Change
-$0.01 (-0.18%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
873.26M
ZPTAF
Price
$4.73
Change
-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
466.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs ZPTAF

Header iconCRLFF vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.43
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
Volume$47.02K
Capitalization873.26M
Surge Energy
Price$4.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.21%)
Volume$24.76K
Capitalization466.99M
CRLFF vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart in %
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. ZPTAF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and ZPTAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $5.44 vs. ZPTAF: $4.74)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 43% vs. ZPTAF: 237%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $873.26M vs. ZPTAF: $466.99M
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $873.26M. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $466.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $108.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZPTAF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -6.85% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -9.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.22% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRLFF($873M) has a higher market cap than ZPTAF($467M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than ZPTAF: CRLFF (13.86) vs ZPTAF (12.07). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 20.504 vs. ZPTAF (16.679). ZPTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 302M vs. CRLFF (226M). CRLFF has less debt than ZPTAF: CRLFF (199M) vs ZPTAF (243M). ZPTAF has higher revenues than CRLFF: ZPTAF (635M) vs CRLFF (578M).
CRLFFZPTAFCRLFF / ZPTAF
Capitalization873M467M187%
EBITDA226M302M75%
Gain YTD20.50416.679123%
P/E Ratio13.8612.07115%
Revenue578M635M91%
Total CashN/A8.43M-
Total Debt199M243M82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7574
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3667
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8674
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
124
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (13). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (67). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (100). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (86). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (12). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYFIX14.660.10
+0.69%
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare I
VLAAX40.240.23
+0.57%
Value Line Asset Allocation Investor
HNVRX42.530.10
+0.24%
Harbor Small Cap Value Retirement
SVALX6.46N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div R6
ECOAX11.43-0.07
-0.61%
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-0.22%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

ZPTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZPTAF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZPTAF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPTAF
1D Price
Change %
ZPTAF100%
-0.33%
BTE - ZPTAF
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
TNEYF - ZPTAF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
VET - ZPTAF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
OBE - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
CRLFF - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
More