CRLFF
Price
$6.20
Change
-$0.18 (-2.82%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
994.38M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZPTAF
Price
$4.87
Change
+$0.02 (+0.41%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
483.05M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs ZPTAF

Header iconCRLFF vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$6.20
Change-$0.18 (-2.82%)
Volume$18.59K
Capitalization994.38M
Surge Energy
Price$4.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.41%)
Volume$79.37K
Capitalization483.05M
CRLFF vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart in %
CRLFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZPTAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. ZPTAF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and ZPTAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $6.20 vs. ZPTAF: $4.87)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 36% vs. ZPTAF: 180%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $994.38M vs. ZPTAF: $483.05M
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $994.38M. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $483.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZPTAF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +4.91% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+5.90% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRLFF($994M) has a higher market cap than ZPTAF($483M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than ZPTAF: CRLFF (17.94) vs ZPTAF (15.04). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: -2.116 vs. ZPTAF (-3.024). ZPTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 282M vs. CRLFF (212M). CRLFF has less debt than ZPTAF: CRLFF (216M) vs ZPTAF (242M). ZPTAF has higher revenues than CRLFF: ZPTAF (616M) vs CRLFF (557M).
CRLFFZPTAFCRLFF / ZPTAF
Capitalization994M483M206%
EBITDA212M282M75%
Gain YTD-2.116-3.02470%
P/E Ratio17.9415.04119%
Revenue557M616M90%
Total CashN/A20.5M-
Total Debt216M242M89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3475
SMR RATING
1..100
7683
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
124
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
985

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPTAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (13). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZPTAF (75). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (83). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (58). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (12). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZPTAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACMTX11.040.05
+0.45%
AB All Market Real Return C
GTTMX18.47N/A
N/A
Glenmede Total Market Plus Eq Ptf
RYTNX394.19-4.11
-1.03%
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy H
URNQX61.04-0.66
-1.07%
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index R6
HCMSX34.39-0.56
-1.60%
HCM Tactical Plus R

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-2.82%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
+3.19%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
+6.27%
More

ZPTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZPTAF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZPTAF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPTAF
1D Price
Change %
ZPTAF100%
+0.51%
BTE - ZPTAF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
TNEYF - ZPTAF
79%
Closely correlated
+3.19%
VET - ZPTAF
77%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
OBE - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
+6.27%
CRLFF - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
More