CRLFF
Price
$4.92
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
745.9M
PIFYF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.03 (-6.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
411.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs PIFYF

Header iconCRLFF vs PIFYF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs PIFYFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$4.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.31K
Capitalization745.9M
Pine Cliff Energy
Price$0.47
Change-$0.03 (-6.00%)
Volume$34.86K
Capitalization411.53M
CRLFF vs PIFYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. PIFYF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Hold and PIFYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $4.93 vs. PIFYF: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and PIFYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 17% vs. PIFYF: 27%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $745.9M vs. PIFYF: $411.53M
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $745.9M. PIFYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $411.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIFYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than PIFYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIFYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PIFYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CRLFF and PIFYF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.55% price change this week, while PIFYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRLFF($746M) has a higher market cap than PIFYF($412M). PIFYF has higher P/E ratio than CRLFF: PIFYF (5.67) vs CRLFF (5.06). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 9.338 vs. PIFYF (-25.805). CRLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318M vs. PIFYF (154M). PIFYF has less debt than CRLFF: PIFYF (3.83M) vs CRLFF (49.1M). CRLFF has higher revenues than PIFYF: CRLFF (601M) vs PIFYF (297M).
CRLFFPIFYFCRLFF / PIFYF
Capitalization746M412M181%
EBITDA318M154M206%
Gain YTD9.338-25.805-36%
P/E Ratio5.065.6789%
Revenue601M297M202%
Total CashN/A62M-
Total Debt49.1M3.83M1,282%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs PIFYF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
PIFYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3674
SMR RATING
1..100
6096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
675
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFYF (42). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFYF (74). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFYF (96). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFYF (60). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFYF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRLFF (67). This means that PIFYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFPIFYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLGEX53.960.71
+1.33%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth I
SASMX35.600.39
+1.11%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth A
GTTRX31.460.27
+0.87%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R
PSLCX10.750.07
+0.66%
Putnam Small Cap Value C
PRKCX7.580.01
+0.13%
PGIM Real Estate Income C

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-0.18%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
TNEYF - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
SPGYF - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
CDDRF - CRLFF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
MEGEF - CRLFF
69%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
More

PIFYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIFYF has been loosely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIFYF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFYF
1D Price
Change %
PIFYF100%
N/A
ZPTAF - PIFYF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
FRHLF - PIFYF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
AETUF - PIFYF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
CRLFF - PIFYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
SPGYF - PIFYF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More