CRLFF
Price
$6.10
Change
-$0.18 (-2.87%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
982.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRHLF
Price
$10.15
Change
-$0.18 (-1.74%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRLFF vs FRHLF

Header iconCRLFF vs FRHLF Comparison
Open Charts CRLFF vs FRHLFBanner chart's image
Cardinal Energy
Price$6.10
Change-$0.18 (-2.87%)
Volume$46.67K
Capitalization982.25M
Freehold Royalties
Price$10.15
Change-$0.18 (-1.74%)
Volume$81.55K
Capitalization1.67B
CRLFF vs FRHLF Comparison Chart in %
CRLFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRHLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRLFF vs. FRHLF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRLFF is a Buy and FRHLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CRLFF: $6.10 vs. FRHLF: $10.15)
Brand notoriety: CRLFF and FRHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRLFF: 125% vs. FRHLF: 199%
Market capitalization -- CRLFF: $982.25M vs. FRHLF: $1.67B
CRLFF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $982.25M. FRHLF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $110.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRLFF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFRHLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the long-term than CRLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRLFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRHLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +6.32% price change this week, while FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.71% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHLF($1.67B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($982M). FRHLF (18.72) and CRLFF (17.81) have similar P/E ratio . CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 35.423 vs. FRHLF (14.173). FRHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 281M vs. CRLFF (226M). CRLFF has less debt than FRHLF: CRLFF (199M) vs FRHLF (294M). CRLFF has higher revenues than FRHLF: CRLFF (578M) vs FRHLF (320M).
CRLFFFRHLFCRLFF / FRHLF
Capitalization982M1.67B59%
EBITDA226M281M80%
Gain YTD35.42314.173250%
P/E Ratio17.8118.7295%
Revenue578M320M181%
Total CashN/A0-
Total Debt199M294M68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRLFF vs FRHLF: Fundamental Ratings
CRLFF
FRHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
147
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3237
SMR RATING
1..100
7162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
923
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (15). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (37). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (71). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (48). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (23). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRLFFFRHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRLFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRHLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACEIX11.29-0.11
-0.96%
Invesco Equity and Income A
TQCAX20.16-0.22
-1.08%
Touchstone Dividend Equity A
HBIOX20.48-0.27
-1.30%
Hartford International Opp HLS IB
JIDVX13.09-0.18
-1.36%
Janus Henderson U.S. Dividend Income I
DTLGX51.23-1.20
-2.29%
Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-2.87%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
+3.63%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.40%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
More

FRHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHLF
1D Price
Change %
FRHLF100%
-1.74%
BTE - FRHLF
72%
Closely correlated
+3.63%
CRLFF - FRHLF
70%
Closely correlated
-2.87%
VET - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
TNEYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.40%
ZPTAF - FRHLF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
More