Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$16.90
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.68M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.67
Change+$0.81 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CRISX (66.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FTHFX (0.76) vs CRISX (0.40). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. CRISX (-6.77). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. CRISX (30.56).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.304 | 4.954 | -87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.7M | 10.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.76 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.77 | 2.03 | -334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.55 | 45.52 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.56 | 99.73 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.73 | 152.73 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement