Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$17.11
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.82M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.54
Change-$0.53 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CRISX (68.8M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FTHFX (0.69) vs CRISX (0.37). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. CRISX (-7.90). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 81.55 vs. CRISX (5.37).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.265 | 14.641 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.69 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.90 | 7.21 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.20 | 47.92 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.37 | 81.55 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.16 | 196.61 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers