Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$17.61
Change+$0.60 (+3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.28M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$53.15
Change+$3.45 (+6.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CRISX (69.3M). CRISX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CRISX (0.79) vs FTHFX (0.63). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. CRISX (-2.22). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 74.78 vs. CRISX (-1.56).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.63 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.134 | 5.019 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.3M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.63 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.22 | 14.49 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.44 | 40.94 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.56 | 74.78 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.95 | 279.59 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement