Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRISX vs FTHFX
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CRISX vs FTHFX
CRM Small Cap Value Instl
Price$17.27
Change+$0.33 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.28M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.89
Change+$0.42 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
CRISX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRISX vs. FTHFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRISX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CRISX (64.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CRISX: FTHFX (0.69) vs CRISX (0.38). CRISX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CRISX (28 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CRISX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). CRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). CRISX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. CRISX (-10.06). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. CRISX (23.23).
| CRISX | FTHFX | CRISX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.63 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.077 | 8.917 | -46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 64.3M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.69 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.06 | -1.91 | 527% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.85 | 50.30 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.23 | 94.83 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.03 | 169.48 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement