Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIHX vs NLSCX
CRIHX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CRIHX vs NLSCX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Instl
Price$12.84
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets390.81M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
CRIHX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIHX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIHX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. CRIHX (391M). CRIHX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CRIHX (0.95) vs NLSCX (0.00). CRIHX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CRIHX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than CRIHX (2.02). CRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 187.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIHX: NLSCX (1000) vs CRIHX (10000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. CRIHX (-1.38). CRIHX (16.77) and NLSCX (16.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CRIHX | NLSCX | CRIHX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 2.43 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.388 | 6.105 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 391M | 7.96B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.38 | 5.21 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.96 | 25.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.77 | 16.51 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement