Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRIHX vs NLSCX
CRIHX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CRIHX vs NLSCX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Instl
Price$12.16
Change-$0.07 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.8M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
CRIHX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRIHX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRIHX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.6B vs. CRIHX (242M). CRIHX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CRIHX (0.99) vs NLSCX (0.00). CRIHX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CRIHX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CRIHX (2.43) and NLSCX (2.43) have similar cost to investors . CRIHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRIHX: NLSCX (1000) vs CRIHX (10000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. CRIHX (-7.67). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.56 vs. CRIHX (13.79).
| CRIHX | NLSCX | CRIHX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 2.43 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.663 | 5.370 | -105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 242M | 7.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.67 | 8.18 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.84 | 12.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.79 | 19.56 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers