CRHKY
Price
$7.12
Change
+$0.06 (+0.85%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
11.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TSGTF
Price
$6.31
Change
-$0.40 (-5.96%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRHKY vs TSGTF

Header iconCRHKY vs TSGTF Comparison
Open Charts CRHKY vs TSGTFBanner chart's image
China Resources Beer Holdings
Price$7.12
Change+$0.06 (+0.85%)
Volume$78.61K
Capitalization11.3B
Tsingtao Brewery
Price$6.31
Change-$0.40 (-5.96%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization10.86B
CRHKY vs TSGTF Comparison Chart in %
CRHKY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSGTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRHKY vs. TSGTF commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRHKY is a StrongBuy and TSGTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (CRHKY: $7.12 vs. TSGTF: $6.31)
Brand notoriety: CRHKY and TSGTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRHKY: 115% vs. TSGTF: 269%
Market capitalization -- CRHKY: $11.3B vs. TSGTF: $10.86B
CRHKY [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $11.3B. TSGTF’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $147.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $26.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRHKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRHKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKY is a better buy in the long-term than TSGTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRHKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRHKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSGTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKY is a better buy in the short-term than TSGTF.

Price Growth

CRHKY (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +6.27% price change this week, while TSGTF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+3.81% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRHKY($11.3B) and TSGTF($10.9B) have the same market capitalization . CRHKY has higher P/E ratio than TSGTF: CRHKY (13.80) vs TSGTF (12.91). CRHKY YTD gains are higher at: 5.388 vs. TSGTF (0.638). CRHKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.08B vs. TSGTF (6.34B). CRHKY has higher revenues than TSGTF: CRHKY (38.6B) vs TSGTF (32.5B).
CRHKYTSGTFCRHKY / TSGTF
Capitalization11.3B10.9B104%
EBITDA9.08B6.34B143%
Gain YTD5.3880.638845%
P/E Ratio13.8012.91107%
Revenue38.6B32.5B119%
Total CashN/A21.1B-
Total DebtN/A115M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRHKY vs TSGTF: Fundamental Ratings
CRHKY
TSGTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1425
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TSGTF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (27). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

TSGTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRHKY (100). This means that TSGTF’s stock grew similarly to CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGTF (54). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to TSGTF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGTF (53). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to TSGTF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGTF (62). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to TSGTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHKYTSGTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRHKY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TSGTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARMU17.193.17
+22.61%
T-Rex 2X Long ARM Daily Target ETF
UPSX34.995.86
+20.12%
Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF
IBBQ29.690.83
+2.87%
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
CAPE33.260.39
+1.20%
DoubleLine Shiller CAPE US Equities ETF
FPEI19.480.03
+0.15%
First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF

CRHKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKY has been loosely correlated with BDWBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKY jumps, then BDWBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRHKY
1D Price
Change %
CRHKY100%
+0.85%
BDWBY - CRHKY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
TSGTY - CRHKY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRNDY - CRHKY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
REMYY - CRHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
CABGY - CRHKY
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
More

TSGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGTF and CRHKY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGTF and CRHKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGTF
1D Price
Change %
TSGTF100%
-5.96%
CRHKY - TSGTF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CABJF - TSGTF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDWBY - TSGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
BDWBF - TSGTF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSGTY - TSGTF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More