CRHKY
Price
$6.33
Change
-$0.06 (-0.94%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.78B
DWWEF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
38.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRHKY vs DWWEF

Header iconCRHKY vs DWWEF Comparison
Open Charts CRHKY vs DWWEFBanner chart's image
China Resources Beer Holdings
Price$6.33
Change-$0.06 (-0.94%)
Volume$30.87K
Capitalization20.78B
Diamond Estates Wines & Spirits
Price$0.14
Change-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization38.98M
CRHKY vs DWWEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRHKY vs. DWWEF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRHKY is a Hold and DWWEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CRHKY: $6.33 vs. DWWEF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CRHKY and DWWEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRHKY: 80% vs. DWWEF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CRHKY: $20.78B vs. DWWEF: $38.98M
CRHKY [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $20.78B. DWWEF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $38.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRHKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDWWEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRHKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DWWEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKY is a better buy in the long-term than DWWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRHKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DWWEF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRHKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DWWEF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRHKY is a better buy in the short-term than DWWEF.

Price Growth

CRHKY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +3.09% price change this week, while DWWEF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -9.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.12% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRHKY($20.8B) has a higher market cap than DWWEF($39M). CRHKY YTD gains are higher at: -4.706 vs. DWWEF (-9.051). CRHKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.13B vs. DWWEF (-264.02K). CRHKY has higher revenues than DWWEF: CRHKY (35.3B) vs DWWEF (27M).
CRHKYDWWEFCRHKY / DWWEF
Capitalization20.8B39M53,333%
EBITDA7.13B-264.02K-2,700,174%
Gain YTD-4.706-9.05152%
P/E Ratio32.79N/A-
Revenue35.3B27M130,741%
Total CashN/A616K-
Total DebtN/A26.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRHKY vs DWWEF: Fundamental Ratings
CRHKY
DWWEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
899
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6179
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRHKY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DWWEF (94). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DWWEF (100). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DWWEF (93). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew significantly faster than DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

CRHKY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as DWWEF (79). This means that CRHKY’s stock grew similarly to DWWEF’s over the last 12 months.

DWWEF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRHKY (59). This means that DWWEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRHKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHKYDWWEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRHKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DWWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CXAI1.020.11
+12.46%
CXApp
DORM124.323.24
+2.68%
Dorman Products
NUS8.090.12
+1.51%
NuSkin Enterprises
LPLA364.960.59
+0.16%
LPL Financial Holdings
ATHA0.29-0.01
-2.64%
Athira Pharma

CRHKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRHKY has been loosely correlated with TSGTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRHKY jumps, then TSGTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRHKY
1D Price
Change %
CRHKY100%
-0.94%
TSGTY - CRHKY
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.27%
PRNDY - CRHKY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
REMYY - CRHKY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
BDWBY - CRHKY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
TSGTF - CRHKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DWWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DWWEF has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DWWEF jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DWWEF
1D Price
Change %
DWWEF100%
N/A
DEO - DWWEF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CWGL - DWWEF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
DVDCF - DWWEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
CRHKY - DWWEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
DGEAF - DWWEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
More