Advertisement
CRH vs OAIM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Hold and OAIM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CRH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.16% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-0.33% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
CRH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRH | OAIM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 13 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 49% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPTL | 26.62 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio L/T Trs ETF | |||
| BRHY | 51.69 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| iShares High Yield Active ETF | |||
| NRSH | 24.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Aztlan NA Nearshoring Stk Sel ETF | |||
| BSMW | 25.33 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2032 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| GSPY | 37.48 | -0.14 | -0.38% |
| Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF | |||
CRH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been loosely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
OAIM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OAIM has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OAIM jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAIM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAIM | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| CRH - OAIM | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| NXPI - OAIM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| ASML - OAIM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| TSM - OAIM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| RIO - OAIM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||