CRH
Price
$127.54
Change
+$0.94 (+0.74%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
85.33B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLM
Price
$643.14
Change
+$4.36 (+0.68%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
38.79B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs MLM

Header iconCRH vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts CRH vs MLMBanner chart's image
CRH Public
Price$127.54
Change+$0.94 (+0.74%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization85.33B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$643.14
Change+$4.36 (+0.68%)
Volume$134.56K
Capitalization38.79B
CRH vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. MLM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Buy and MLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CRH: $127.54 vs. MLM: $643.14)
Brand notoriety: CRH and MLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 20% vs. MLM: 33%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $85.33B vs. MLM: $38.79B
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $85.33B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $38.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $85.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the long-term than MLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than CRH.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.65% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +15.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+15.31% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($85.3B) has a higher market cap than MLM($38.8B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than CRH: MLM (33.05) vs CRH (25.46). CRH YTD gains are higher at: 39.399 vs. MLM (25.072). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.38B vs. MLM (2.32B). CRH has more cash in the bank: 4.2B vs. MLM (57M). MLM has less debt than CRH: MLM (5.9B) vs CRH (20.7B). CRH has higher revenues than MLM: CRH (36.9B) vs MLM (6.9B).
CRHMLMCRH / MLM
Capitalization85.3B38.8B220%
EBITDA7.38B2.32B318%
Gain YTD39.39925.072157%
P/E Ratio25.4633.0577%
Revenue36.9B6.9B535%
Total Cash4.2B57M7,365%
Total Debt20.7B5.9B351%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
391
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1018
SMR RATING
1..100
5463
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4130
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRH's Valuation (19) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (88). This means that CRH’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (18). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's SMR Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (63). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (41). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (19). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOLD34.501.63
+4.96%
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natrl Gas
QLD72.730.37
+0.51%
ProShares Ultra QQQ
COWS33.670.13
+0.40%
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
IXG122.440.47
+0.39%
iShares Global Financials ETF
RSMR22.070.04
+0.17%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been loosely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
+0.74%
VMC - CRH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MLM - CRH
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
KNF - CRH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
EXP - CRH
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
BCC - CRH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+0.68%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
EXP - MLM
74%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
CRH - MLM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
KNF - MLM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
BCC - MLM
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More